I recently read a report by the Yorkshire Building Society that 54% of the country has seen wages (salaries) rise faster than property prices in the last 10 years. The report said that in the Midlands and North, salaries had outperformed property prices since 2007, whilst in other parts of the UK, especially in the South, the opposite has happened and property prices have outperformed salaries quite noticeably.
As regular readers of my blog know, I always like to find out what has actually happened locally in Liverpool. To talk of North and South is not specific enough for me. Therefore, to start, I looked at what has happened to salaries locally since 2007. Looking at the Office of National Statistics (ONS) data for Liverpool City Council, some interesting figures came out…
Salaries in Liverpool have risen by 20.81% since 2007 (although it’s been a bit of a rollercoaster ride to get there!) – interesting when you compare that with what has happened to salaries regionally (an increase of 15.77%) and nationally, an increase of 17.61%.
Next, I needed to find what had happened to property prices locally over the same time frame of 2007 and today. Net property values in Liverpool are 1.77% higher than they were in mid 2007 (not forgetting they did dip in 2008 and 2009). Therefore…
Wages in the Liverpool area have increased at a higher rate than property values to the tune of 19.04% … meaning, Liverpool is in line with the regional trend
All this is important, as the relationship between salaries and property values is the basis on how affordable property is to all buyers. It is also vitally relevant for Liverpool landlords, as they need to be aware of this when making their buy-to-let plans for the future. If more Liverpool people are buying, then demand for Liverpool rental properties will drop (and vice versa).
As I have discussed in a few articles in my blog recently, this issue of ‘property-affordability’ is a great bellwether to the future direction of the Liverpool property market. Now of course, it isn’t as simple as comparing salaries and property prices, as that measurement disregards issues such as low mortgage rates and the diminishing proportion of disposable income that is spent on mortgage repayments.
On the face of it, the change between 2007 and 2017 in terms of the ‘property-affordability’ hasn’t been that great. However, look back another 10 years to 1997, and that tells a completely different story. Nationally, the affordability of property more than halved between 1997 and today. In 1997, house prices were on average 3.5 times workers’ annual wages, whereas in 2016 workers could typically expect to spend around 7.7 times annual wages on purchasing a home.
The issue of a lack of homeownership has its roots in the 1980’s and 1990’s. It’s quite hard as a tenant to pay your rent and save money for a deposit simultaneously, meaning for many Liverpool people, home ownership isn’t a realistic goal. Earlier in the year, the Tories released proposals to combat the country’s ‘broken’ housing market, setting out plans to make renting more affordable, while increasing the security of rental deals and threatening to bring tougher legal action to cases involving bad landlords.
This is all great news for Liverpool tenants and decent law-abiding Liverpool landlords (and indirectly owner occupier homeowners). Whatever has happened to salaries or property prices in Liverpool in the last 10 (or 20) years … the demand for decent high-quality rental property keeps growing. If you want a chat about where the Liverpool property market is going – please read my other blog posts on www.liverpoolpropertyblog.com or drop me note via email, like many Liverpool landlords are doing.